Is your client...

[Click on a question to expand/close]

  • developing a new product?

    What’s on the horizon?

  • utilizing an in-house research and development (R&D) group?

    What products are in development?

  • developing new, or adapting existing, technology to provide new services?

    How did they acquire this technology?

  • commissioning their R&D?

    How do they handle those relationships?

  • exporting products to foreign markets, physically or electronically?

    Do they need a commerce export license?

  • utilizing independent contractors to create software or other works?

    Do they have agreements to ensure ownership of the finished product is transferred to the client?

  • using the internet to connect with customers?

    Are they collecting and storing information surrounding those interactions or transactions?

    Do they need a privacy or social media policy?

IPe-At-a-Glance
[Click on an Item to expand/close]

22 Attorneys

  • Representative Clients

    Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp

    Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc.

    Bridgestone Americas

    Corning

    C.R. Bard

    Kraft Foods Global, Inc.

    LexisNexis

    NASCAR

    Ohio Willow Wood Company

    Toyota

    Vantiv

    Walmart.com

     

  • What We Do

    Intellectual Property Licensing

    Intellectual Property Litigation

    Technology and Data Protection

    Entertainment

  • IPE By the Numbers

    575+

    Licensing agreements in the past two years

    $7.5 Billion
    in sales resulting from our product licensing work

    200+ litigators

    and a robust litigation support staff firm wide

    35 trademark matters/15 copyright matters
    litigated since 2010

    Negotiated hundreds of research agreements
    for multiple clients, including cooperative research and development agreements with national laboratories and research agreements with domestic and foreign universities

    Technical knowledge
    of data privacy issues and export control, combined with skilled litigators

  • Creating Value

    A process-oriented structure
    to build efficiency and exceed client expectations.

    Many of our attorneys have in-house counsel experience
    with major companies, bringing unique business strategy whereby we look to address and manage the full spectrum of risks
     as an interrelated risk portfolio.

    A comprehensive internal system
    for managing applications and registrations

    Bench and experience
    to handle any size IP litigation, including contentious disputes before both the Patent and Trademark Trial and Appeal Boards.

    Experienced lead and consulting counsel
    in numerous post-grant proceedings before the USPTO, including inter partes review proceedings.

    Work with companies to analyze privacy policies and rules
    for data collection, data management procedures, ecommerce matters and exporting data to foreign countries.

    We leverage a thorough knowledge of business and technology
    to help clients mitigate risk through a wide variety of licensing agreements, including software license agreements, end user license agreements, SaaS agreements and OEM license agreements.

Experience Highlights
[Click on an Item to expand/close]

  • Ohio Willow Wood Company: IP Litigation

    We are representing the Ohio Willow Wood Company in a number of patent infringement cases throughout the country involving prosthetic liners and sleeves.  In the primary case, prior to our involvement, our client had been found to infringe, damages had been awarded and enhanced for willful infringement, a permanent injunction had been issued and our client found in contempt for sales of a redesigned product, a receiver had been appointed, and our client had been forbidden from selling any other new products without approval of the court.  Alps South, LLC v. The Ohio Willow Wood Co. (MDFL).  We successfully litigated a contested motion to obtain district court permission for our client to market another modified product, prevailed in convincing the court not to enhance damages on infringing sales that occurred after the trial or on the sales of the redesigned product that the district court had found to be in contempt, and obtained an order from the Federal Circuit staying the district court’s contempt order during the appeal, thus eliminating the receiver’s restrictions on the client, the prohibition on the client selling the “contempt” product, and the requirement for approval of any other products. Alps South, LLC v. The Ohio Willow Wood Co. We are also representing the client in several other, related cases in Florida, Ohio, and the Eastern District of Texas.

  • Reed Elsevier, Inc.: IP Litigation

    We defended Reed Elsevier, Inc. against allegations that its Lexis Advance and Lexis Academic products infringed patents relating to data storage, search, and retrieval, which was successfully transferred to the S.D. Ohio and ultimately dismissed based upon our demonstration of non-infringement and lack of potential damages. Cascades Publishing Innovation, LLC v. Reed Elsevier, Inc. (NDIL)

  • Toyota: Research and Licensing Agreements

    We have represented Toyota for more than a decade in drafting and negotiating hundreds of research and licensing agreements, including Advanced Research Agreements, Consortium Agreements, Nondisclosure Agreements, Material Transfer Agreements, Cooperative Research and Development Agreements, and Consulting Agreements. In this role, we have worked with in-house counsel, as well as Toyota’s outside counsel, to streamline processes, contract language and negotiation tactics. We add value through offering flat fee billing, making routine visits to Toyota, and creating alternative contract templates and processes for unique situations.

  • Toyota: Data Protection

    We advised Toyota throughout a severe data breach by a former employee, including the immediate filing of a civil suit and temporary restraining order to keep the suspect from leaving the country. We then quickly began working with Toyota to thoroughly investigate the breach and upon completion, turned over our findings to the FBI to help build their criminal case.

  • Maker Studios: Strategic Partnership/Production Agreements

    We negotiated and drafted a Strategic Partnership Agreement between Maker Studios and Tribeca Enterprises to create the YouTube channel “Picture Show” featuring an original web series and short films. We advise Maker on talent and other production agreements addressing the intellectual property issues at the forefront of the entertainment industry.

  • Graceland: (NECA) IP Licensing Rights

    We represented National Entertainment Collectibles Association (NECA) in acquiring the intellectual property rights to iconic musician Elvis Presley, and operation of his Graceland Estate (Licensing).

Attorney Roster
[Click on an office to expand/collapse]

DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP | LEGAL COUNSEL

 

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. Nothing in this presentation should be construed or is intended to be legal advice.  All images, videos, copyrights, and trademarks used in the presentation are property of their respective owners.  Copyright 2017. All rights reserved.

 

  • Ohio Willow Wood Company: IP Litigation

  • Reed Elsevier, Inc.: IP Litigation

  • Toyota: Research and Licensing Agreements